The Archbishop of Canterbury says the adoption of certain aspects of Sharia law in the UK "seems unavoidable".Goodness, no, we wouldn't want to make them do that. Where do they think this is, England or something?
...
Dr Williams argues that adopting parts of Islamic Sharia law would help maintain social cohesion.
...
He says Muslims should not have to choose between "the stark alternatives of cultural loyalty or state loyalty".
The BBC has the full article.
--------------------
Update: There has been a considerable backlash against the Archbishop's statement, both from the Anglican clergy and the community at large. The Times has a selection of blogs.
--------------------
Update, February 10: The Archbishop has now tried to retract his original statement, saying in a statement on his website that he "made no proposals for sharia" and "did not call for its introduction as some kind of parallel jurisdiction to the civil law."
At the same time he argues that "the very term sharia is not only misunderstood, but is the focus of much fear and anxiety deriving from its 'primitivist' application in some contexts."
The Gates of Vienna continues to blog on this topic here and here:
I admit to being surprised at the depth of the antagonism towards the Archdhimmi, especially from within the Anglican hierarchy. Is it possible that they have been roused from slumber?




